January 2026
2026 Member Survey
We ran our first member survey since 2024 to understand what members want from FWB and how we should focus our energy in 2026.
Who Responded
1.190% members for 2+ years. Primarily long-time members who've been less active recently.
Who Responded
Member Activity Level
The Big Picture
1.2Two things came through clearly:
1.Content and events are equally important.
29% said content that builds cultural credibility should be our top focus. 23% said events and IRL programming. Together, that's more than half of you. These aren't competing priorities—they're two sides of the same thing. Content builds the voice; events build the connections. Both make FWB worth being part of.
2.Members want to participate and need pathways.
90% of you said you'd contribute something if the pathways existed. 40% would help organize local events. 60% would participate in curation.
How to Read This Data
1.3This analysis distinguishes between three types of questions:
Comparative Priority Questions
Force trade-offs, show what members actually prioritize against alternatives
Hypothetical Willingness Questions
Ask 'if we did X, would you Y?' — Show potential, not demand
Current State Questions
Describe what is, not what members want
The Throughline
1.5FWB holds a special place for people. Members are loyal because they found their people here and they want to see it return to form: a hub for creatives with deep curiosity about tech, art, and culture, gathering at the bleeding edge where these things converge and pull the future into reality.
Membership is what makes it whole. Events, editorial, programming, FEST are interconnected, meant to speak to each other. They create a cycle that builds momentum and compounds over time.
FWB occupies rare territory: sophisticated enough to build and ship things, culturally credible, genuinely invested in making together and willing to hold a position on what's emerging, open without being credulous. The work now is to return to that space and build from it.
Section Two
Survey Results
Where We Are
2.1How valuable does FWB membership feel right now?
27% find it valuable (6% very, 21% somewhat). 33% are neutral. 40% are uncertain or feel it's not delivering yet. There's significant opportunity to rebuild.
What have you gotten from FWB connections?
FWB delivers on friendships (65%) but professional outcomes are lower (~20% range). Nearly a quarter haven't gotten tangible outcomes yet.
How do you want to hear from FWB?
Email edges out Discord as the preferred channel.
What other communities are you part of?
Members already pay for content and engage in communities. The model works when value is clear.
How do you feel about paid membership?
63% are open or persuadable. Clear value has to come first.
What would you pay per month?
The ceiling is $20/month. Most prefer under $10. Active members are more willing to pay in the $10-20 range.
What Matters Most
2.2What keeps you engaged with FWB?
Select top 2
Relationships and identity matter most for retention. Events rank above content. Governance is least important.
Pick ONE thing for FWB to prioritize in the next 3 months
Content and events are the clear top priorities — together representing over half of all responses.
What would bring you back if you've been less engaged?
Local events are the #1 reactivation factor, followed closely by quality content.
How important is FEST to your membership?
FEST matters deeply to a dedicated group (13%), but isn't central for most. 31% have never attended.
What Engages Members
2.3What content formats would you engage with?
Events lead, but newsletter and editorial have strong support. Mix series and social content are lower priority.
What topics interest you?
Members want practical, useful content — technology and tools leads at 81%.
Publications and creators members follow
Cultural Commentary
Investigative / Critical
Business / Tech
A mix of thoughtful cultural commentary, investigative journalism, and mainstream tech/business. FWB's voice should live in that first category.
If we built a directory, what features would you want?
92% would use a directory if it existed. But only 13% prioritize building it now — it's wanted, not urgent.
Local Events Interest
This is a center of gravity for members. We just need to recreate the pathways.
Cities with potential organizers
How Can Members Shape FWB
2.4What would you contribute if pathways existed?
90% would contribute something if pathways existed. The energy is there — we need to make it easy.
Preferred governance methods
77% have participated in governance. Main barriers: time, feeling votes don't matter, lost momentum.
What keeps you from participating in governance?
- Time — the most common response by far
- Feeling like votes don't matter — 'small tokens vs big stack'
- Lost momentum — 'Discord seemed dead'
- Hard to find / follow proposals
Governance participation requires lowering friction and rebuilding trust that input matters.
In Members' Words
2.5What members said
Members still believe in FWB. The challenge is rebuilding momentum and delivering consistent value.
Section Three
The Plan
Based on the survey, here's what we're building.
What We're Doing
3.1Events Are Returning
Event Keys was the most-requested thing in the survey, by a wide margin.
48% of you wanted member-led local events to return. 96% said you'd attend local FWB events. 40% said you'd help organize.
Starting this month, we're reopening Event Keys with a rolling application. If you want to host a dinner, a salon, a party, a workshop, or any gathering in your city — apply. We'll provide a small budget, assets, and promotion. You bring the idea and the energy.
Beyond Event Keys, we're actively working on FWB-hosted events in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Paris, ETH Denver, and CDMX. If you're in any of these cities and want to be involved, reach out. And if you're in a city not on this list and want to make something happen, reach out too.
We're also restarting digital events: both member-curated gatherings and workshops focused on tech and tooling, which came through as a strong interest area in the survey.
Media Reboot
Members want content worth reading.
58% said they'd engage with editorial and written pieces. 81% want content about technology and tools. 65% want content about creative careers.
We're rebuilding a consistent editorial voice — more curated, more original, more of a point of view. We're opening a #curation channel in Discord where you can surface things you're reading, watching, thinking about. The stuff that bubbles up there will feed into what we publish.
Think of it as bringing FEST to life year-round: a continuous cycle of editorial and programming that builds toward and flows out of the festival itself.
Governance & Participation
90% of you said you'd contribute something if the pathways existed.
We're working on making those pathways clearer. On governance specifically: we're focusing on making the process simpler. That means more structure around proposals — a clearer format, a call for proposals that helps you shape ideas into things we can actually act on. The goal is to lower the barrier to participating while making participation more meaningful.
On Membership
We asked about paid membership. The responses were honest:
- 63% are open to it or persuadable — but want to see the value first
- Most prefer something under $10/month
- Some are skeptical, and that's fair
Here's the reality: for FWB to be sustainable long-term, we need a membership model. So in the coming months, we're going to revitalize what FWB membership means and explore a paid model with a grandfathering period for existing members.
What does that look like? We're building toward a platform that brings together editorial, radio, and programming — a member portal and home for FWB's cultural output. We're exploring partnerships that add tangible value: credits for services and tools, early access to products, co-creation opportunities with brands, and even participating as a DAO in governance for other organizations and protocols. We'll also pursue ecosystem grants and funding from arts and cultural institutions. Given FWB's history as a DAO and cultural organization, there are opportunities to broaden our network and create new pathways for members.
At its core, FWB sits at a unique intersection: sophisticated enough to build and ship things for itself, culturally tuned enough to shape taste, curious enough to engage with emerging tech through a critical lens. We're comfortable at the bleeding edge (not just crypto, but AI, hardware, novel interfaces, new coordination mechanisms) holding nuanced positions with curiosity and irreverence. Technology is a means, not the end. The point is what we make together.
What's Coming & When
3.2- Event Keys applications open
- ETH Denver events
- First member-led events approved
- Editorial and TLDR reboot
- Discord #curation channel launches for members to submit ideas for editorial, programming, and workshops
- Outreach to new and existing partners about new ways of working together
Have Feedback?
Share your thoughts in #town-hall or attend the next Town Hall on Monday, February 9, 2026 in Discord.